Australia's big four banks may not be as comfortable with a proposed ban on mortgage exit fees as they are letting on, a Treasury official says.
Under the federal government's proposed reforms to improve banking competition, exit fees on new standard variable home loans would be banned from July 1 this year.
Many small players in the banking sector have expressed concern about the financial impacts of the proposed ban.
ANZ and National Australia Bank have already scrapped mortgage exit fees, while Westpac Banking Group chief executive Gail Kelly told a Senate committee into banking competition in January that a ban was "not an overly big deal".
However, Treasury Department executive director of markets group Jim Murphy on Wednesday said the big four may be holding back their concerns on the move.
"They may be putting a good face on something," he told the Senate committee's final hearing, held in Sydney.
"One of the institutions is continuing to argue, saying that that's a poor policy response by the government."
Mr Murphy said Treasury's discussions with one of the major lenders that had removed exit fees revealed serious consequences.
"We have had consultations with one of the major banks who have told us they have had significant loss of business since they removed exit fees," he said, without naming the bank.
"I can't argue with that. We've got to take them on face value.
"But what they said to us was 'we think we've got a good product out there, we think our policy of consumers first is going to win us the day, and we think our wind up of mortgages will return back to what we think it should be even though it will be higher than what we had when we had exit fees'.
"So I think it (the proposed ban on exit fees) has had a competitive impact."
Treasury officials defended the reforms in today's hearing, and said increased public debate sparked by the reforms was already improving competition among the banks.
Mr Murphy said Treasury had investigated "super profits taxes" on financial institutions in place in European countries and the United States, but that was not an indication the federal government was considering a similar move.
Share This Article
Previous Articles
- November 2024 1
- October 2024 1
- August 2024 1
- July 2024 1
- June 2024 1
- May 2024 3
- April 2024 2
- March 2024 1
- February 2024 1
- November 2023 1
- October 2023 1
- September 2023 1
- August 2023 1
- July 2023 1
- June 2023 1
- May 2023 2
- April 2023 1
- March 2023 1
- February 2023 1
- January 2023 1
- December 2022 1
- November 2022 3
- October 2022 1
- September 2022 2
- August 2022 1
- July 2022 4
- June 2022 3
- May 2022 2
- April 2022 1
- March 2022 1
- February 2022 1
- January 2022 1
- October 2021 1
- September 2021 4
- August 2021 1
- July 2021 2
- May 2021 1
- April 2021 2
- March 2021 2
- February 2021 1
- January 2021 2
- December 2020 2
- November 2020 2
- October 2020 2
- August 2020 1
- May 2020 2
- April 2020 2
- November 2019 1
- October 2019 1
- August 2019 1
- July 2019 1
- June 2019 1
- May 2019 1
- February 2019 1
- January 2019 1
- October 2018 1
- September 2018 1
- July 2018 2
- June 2018 2
- May 2018 1
- April 2018 2
- March 2018 3
- January 2018 1
- December 2017 3
- November 2017 1
- October 2017 1
- August 2017 1
- July 2017 1
- June 2017 5
- May 2017 31
- April 2017 30
- March 2017 32
- February 2017 28
- January 2017 31
- December 2016 31
- November 2016 29
- October 2016 30
- September 2016 30
- August 2016 26